Scotch

Whisky Review: Alexander Murray Islay 23-Year-Old

We review the Alexander Murray Islay 23-Year-Old from an independent bottler. It's not a bad whiskey, but if you're looking for something emblematic of Islay, this isn't it.

OVERALL RATING

Like Conversation

Tasting Notes

About:

Appearance:
Solid amber tones with fairly strong legs.
Nose:
Sweet, bright, and somewhat astringent. The nose opens after quite some time (15-20+ minutes) to reveal more nuanced floral and cereal notes. Hints of oatmeal and lavender.
Palate:
Sweet and rather full on the palate as far as mouthfeel goes. Decently coats the tongue and mouth in a more dense presentation than I anticipated from the nose. Sweet caramel and vanilla initially with salt transitioning into the mid-palate. The finish moves quickly, as the burn is not intense nor long lived. There are heavy lingering notes of sweet tea with lemon in the aftertaste. Very straightforward in terms of flavors. Not terribly deeply layered, but balanced fairly well in its simplicity. Final Thoughts & Score/Buy A Bottle: Score: 80/100 This whisky is probably best described merely as “fine.” (Not to be confused with “fine!”) Not an immediately incredible whisky, but an interesting deviation from what has become considered traditional Islay fare. Gone are the chewy peat notes and permeating smoke. I would definitely be more likely to expect this palate from a Highland or Speyside distillery rather than one bearing the name Islay. All things considered, I see the handling of the legally necessary obfuscation regarding sourcing here to be a significant hindrance. The problem is that the folks at Alexander Murray & Co. have made the decision to label this release as simply “Islay,” and in doing so may have made more of a statement than they perhaps intended. For the uninitiated, to assume this whisky to be emblematic of Islay as a region would be a mistake. Perhaps a little more creative branding would redeem the bottle somewhat. As it stands now, it is not bad whisky. However, many would be understood for considering it to be a disappointment.
Finish:
Comments:

Editor’s Note: This whiskey was either bought as a sample by The Whiskey Wash or provided to us as a review sample by the party behind it. Per our editorial policies, this in no way influenced the outcome of this review.

Joshua St. John

When not savoring whiskey, Joshua St. John can likely be found exploring the trails of the Pacific Northwest near his Portland, Oregon, home. A lifelong world traveler, he was first captivated by single malts during visits to Scottish distilleries. He continues to explore the globe, discovering its diverse cultures through the myriad expressions of his beloved spirit.

All Posts

Latest On The Whiskey Wash

Blood Oath Pact 12 Bourbon Review

Can Italian dry red wine casks tame sweet Kentucky bourbon? Blood Oath Pact 12’s double Montepulciano and Sangiovese finish may be the most polarizing yet.